skater
Senior Associate
Posts: 44
|
Post by skater on Jan 10, 2003 16:03:10 GMT -5
Hum... maybe they didn't blink an eye because "something" has gone on between them. I don't think it was the horizontal tango, but something happened behind that closed door. Or... seeing Nick in his T-shirt and boxers caused a chemical reaction (did with me!) and Lulu totally forgot that she thinks he's an ass most of the time. Hum... :firedevil:
|
|
|
|
Post by NAOMI on Jan 11, 2003 18:58:19 GMT -5
TO MAY: WHY IS EX-CON CREEPY? IN ALL I'VE SEEN HE'S MAKING A VALIANT EFFORT AT ADJUSTING TO A NEW LIFE. SINCE LULU HAS HELPED HIM, HE NATURALLY WANTS TO SEE HER, NOT COLD, UNCARING NICK.
|
|
|
|
Post by NAOMI on Jan 11, 2003 19:26:41 GMT -5
TO VARIOUS NICKITES: I THINK ICONIC SOUP MAKES IT CLEAR THAT SOME OF THE RECENT SHOWS ARE RE-RUNS. BUT WHY? I TUNED IN ONLY IN OCT --what on earth --or elsewhere could i have been doing before?? SO THE COMPLEX PLOT TURNS ARE ALL CONFUSING TO ME. DON'T CARE; I'D WATCH SB READ THE PHONE BOOK.
DID ANYONE NOTE THAT THE FLICK LULU IS WATCHING UNDER THE BLANKET IS THE OLDIE/GOODIE "IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT?" HILARIOUS COMEDY W. CLARK GABLE AND CLAUDETTE COLBERT --JUST WHAT LULU PROBABLY WISHES SHE HAD W. NICK.
ANYWAY, WHY IS EV'ONE SO SURPRISED AT N'S SLEAZY BEHAVIOR IN THAT SCENE? HASN'T HE BEHAVED WORSE?? CONSIDER HIS TOTAL ARROGANCE IN (WAS IT ?) THE PILOT, WHEN, AFTER DEAR LAURIE** ADMIRED HIS SUIT, HE SAID SHE LOOKED LIKE KRAP.
ALSO, I HATED HIS UTTER UNCARING COOL IN SAYING "THE MONSTER" KID'S BEING SENTENCED AS AN ADULT WAS "WHAT HE DESERVED."
**DID ANYONE SEE/LOVE HER IN "ANGELS IN AMERICA?"
|
|
|
|
Post by NAOMI on Jan 11, 2003 19:32:15 GMT -5
TO SKATER: THOSE BOXERS ARE AWFUL! TRUE, I S'POSE A CORPORATE LAWYER WOULD WEAR BOXERS, BUT ANYONE AS SEXY AS OUR NICK WOULD WEAR SOMETHING TIGHTER, LESS OLD-MAN-ISH, WOULDN'T HE?
I ASKED ICONIC SOUP WHOSE COSTUME CHOICE THAT WAS, SHE HAD NO IDEA. IF YOU'VE SEEN PIX OF SB W. FAMILY/FRIENDS, YOU KNOW HE LIKES LOOSE, EVEN BAGGY SHORTS. SO MAYBE HE INSISTED ON COMFORT OVER SEXINESS?
|
|
|
|
Post by quilter on Jan 12, 2003 17:17:54 GMT -5
I would love to know if Nick really thought Kim was asleep or was she just interested in what would happen should he leave her bed and go to the livingroom with Lulu.
Did you notice how quickly Kim arrived on the scene with the statement of "guess noone can sleep tonight" or something to that effect.
NF should have put his pants on and perhaps Kim would not have arrived in the kitchen/livingroom so quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by spunkymungbeans on Jan 12, 2003 19:41:14 GMT -5
If you want to catch up on the whole story you can read the episode summaries at this site, or read the transcripts at SimonSphere (www.simonsphere.com).
My belief is that they chose that one for a very specific reason. Not only the title, but the whole 'walls of Jericho' thing in the movie itself.
No one who watches the show is ever surprised by Nick's bad behaviour. He is the poster boy of bad behaviour. Its just that he sank to a new low this time.
And he didn't tell Laurie she looked like crap. He said " I didn't say, 'Hey, you look like crap', ..." LOL
Thanks for posting Naomi. Just a request though. In future could you please not 'SHOUT'. It hurts the eyes and is hard to read.
|
|
|
|
Post by spunkymungbeans on Jan 12, 2003 19:45:25 GMT -5
To each their own. I thought the boxers were dead sexy.
|
|
skater
Senior Associate
Posts: 44
|
Post by skater on Jan 12, 2003 21:15:09 GMT -5
To each their own. I thought the boxers were dead sexy. Thanks for the support Spunky. Yes to each their own, however, I for one can think of nothing sexier that a nice pair of boxers. Besides, lets one use their imagination... long fingers... big feet... you know the rest! :read2: |
|
